I also have a bug report about problems with xcopy and 2.2.7 I think we should really check if it is something we break.
Simo. On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 13:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, Steve & all! > > In dir.c Jeremy added the following fix: > > revision 1.48.4.21 > date: 2002/09/10 01:58:58; author: jra; state: Exp; lines: +18 -3 > Added final Steve French patch for "required"attributes with old > dir listings. Added regression test in smbtorture (in HEAD) also. > Jeremy. > > I have a case where this breaks an unattended w2k install, or shorter: > an xcopy /S. What were you trying to fix, and what happens if I back > out this? > > Volker > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Key-ID D32186CF, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 3700000 > > iD8DBQE960veOmSXH9Mhhs8RAsbGAJsHThjxAqAnlrpzXrSh7SZVTB2FhgCfVeKh > kNIM+YUqH1YzfAb1KH7rdts= > =RD86 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
