-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Yes, I've heard that this is the case. The point I was trying to make > for the sake of argument is that one can treat SMB as transport as one > would TCP/IP.
Ok. I was only trying to find out what you can do without port 135. BTW, Ethereal does not speak much about MAPI... > While we have implemetned "named pipes" on top of UNIX domain sockets, > it is important to note that they are logically distinct from raw > DCE RPC over domain sockets (ncalrpc). > > Non-named pipe clients must make a DCE RPC BIND or ALTER_CONTEXT in order > to authenticate themselves to the RPC server. Ah, ok. Sounds reasonable. Although I'm not really the one to argue about that. I have not looked at DCE RPC enough to really know what's going on and how much of it is in actual use. Volker -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Key-ID D32186CF, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 3700000 iD8DBQE9+JG8OmSXH9Mhhs8RAtfdAJ9c3DwQ62+4RUdzuvFOKIm/sruI2QCgmkCU jtCDXupgXClpebcBNyW49lU= =3Erv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
