On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 14:26, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: > At 00:10 03.01.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > >Talloc doesn't work that way, and should not be made to work that way. > >If you want that, then you have malloc() and free(). > > I think it would be a nice (and usefull!) to have talloc_free() and > talloc_realloc_strdup() > > Does anybody else has an opinion on that???
If you want to use talloc you do not want to manage memory If you want to manage memory you do not want to use talloc Simo. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Samba Team - http://www.samba.org Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
