-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi, > > Has anyone tried this or does anyone have any opinions on what would > happen if we refuse to provide mangled names in the responses to a > find-first or find-next? > > It seems that if we set the Short File Name Len to 0 in responses, that > might work. > > I wonder which apps will break in that case? > > The reason for wanting to do this is performance related :-) Can't you do the same thing on NTFS when you tell it not to generate 8.3 filenames? You just can't run any DOS/16-bit apps. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+NdwKIR7qMdg1EfYRAnhjAJ4rDAgiSusxocPR3vbawcckb+8AzgCfVwFm eL5r/RMODIKk9eoHyNRQ84g= =k9p/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
