At 01:29 04.02.2003 +1100, Arthur Barrett wrote:
yep, it would be fine to have a readonly dir with the samba source treeHi All!I am new to Samba and this group and I have a question... My company wants to make a "custom" version of Samba which is capable of creating a "share" which is actually a union of two directories. ie: instead of the share "\\samba\arthur" being /home/arthur, we want the share "\\samba\arthur" to be the union of the two directories /home/common and /home/arthur Why? It's all to do with version control and limitations in other software. The idea is to create a "reserved checkout" in a single directory. ie: all the "read only" code is in /home/common and the "checked out" code is in /home/arthur", but the silly end product software wants all the files in 1 directory (\\samba\arthur). Oh woe is me! So my question is: which source code file is the one that actually opens files in the unix file system ? Additionally - is anyone else interested in the result ?
and for each machine I connect from a writeable dir where the *.o files and the binaries are stored.
so I can have one source tree and can compile it on different machines
and if I make changes to the source I didn't need to merge them each time to the dir
witch the other machine use.
...
metze
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
