Hi Garry, I missed that in the original post, thanks. Do you do a lot of printing? I seem to remember a problem involving smbd's remaining open because of print status requests or something that Jeremy Allison was working on, but I can't find it. Either way, I think upping your flocks table space should help.... Don
> -----Original Message----- > From: Grierson, Garry (UK07) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:42 > To: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > I did mention in my original post that I think the systems > resource issues > are coming from the fact that unused smbd deamon processes > are clogging up > the system and wont die, rather than the other way round. > > So I'm not sure if upping the resource table sizes would > solve the problem > or just delay it. > > I will try this and see if it makes a difference. > > Thank's for your response. > Garry. > -----Original Message----- > From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 03 February 2003 19:20 > To: 'Grierson, Garry (UK07)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > Samba 2.2.7 uses fcntl locks on a regular basis for internal > locking, even if you have set strict locking and posix locks=no. > The errors you are getting in your log indicate that you have > run out of the system resource controlling the size of the fcntl > lock table. > You will need to go into SAM (or have your hpux sysadm do this) > and increase the kernel parameter (nflocks). > > Hope this helps, > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Grierson, Garry (UK07) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:08 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > > > > The W2K client systems may be at different service pack > > levels: most are > > probably at 2 or 3. > > Samba 2.2.7 is running on HP-UX 11. > > > > The last entries in the log.smbd before this happens are: > > [2003/02/03 10:59:40, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 10:59:40, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 10:59:54, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 10:59:54, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 11:00:19, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 11:00:19, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 11:00:32, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 11:00:32, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 11:02:55, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > [2003/02/03 11:02:55, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:(281) > > nt_printing_init: Failed to open nt forms database > > /usr/local/samba/locks/ntforms.tdb (No locks available) > > > > There is nothing strictly reproducible as it seems like a > > random thing! > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 02 February 2003 15:46 > > To: 'Grierson, Garry (UK07)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > > > > (please reply to list) > > > > Some standard questions... > > > > What service pack level for W2K? > > What operating system are you running under samba 2.2.7? > > Do you have a reproducible test case you can post? > > Anything out of the ordinary in your smb.conf file? > > > > Sounds like an operating system resource-limit issue... > > > > PG > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Grierson, Garry (UK07) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:45 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: FW: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > > > > > > > The log.smbd file has lots of (No locks available) errors.. > > > > > > Any help? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Grierson, Garry (UK07) > > > > Sent: 28 January 2003 11:36 > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Subject: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000 > > > > > > > > I have been successfully running with Samba 2.0.7 for more > > > than a year now > > >
