-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I'm wondering, why are our printing databases (for things like the print > queue) indexed by service name, rather than printer name? IMO it is better to deal with services than printers since printer names in CUPS or /etc/printcap are outside of our scope. Services is what we know about. > Doesn't this mean we will get 'weird stuff' happening if we have two > names for a printer? Two service names? or two /etc/printcap entries pointing to the same phyiscal printer? > I'm getting some very weird behavior where printer name is based on %m, > with some uninitialized data being output back the the client. why would you want to do this? Unitialized data in what? cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+U8XQIR7qMdg1EfYRAnbHAJ9l5wWdt1uOtDVhZNT+EgU74Zm5EACfYWnv OpIlwjHrlxneRR0IHiKI7Jw= =EFLl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
