I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the weekend.
Chris -)----- On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:51:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Previously I wrote: > > > It appears that name_resolve_bcast() does not find hosts in a workgroup if > > there are only win98 or win95 machines in the workgroup. > > The method that's being used for browsing, where a cli_session_request() is > sent to the master browser, does not work if the master browser is a win98 > machine. The win98 machine returns 0x83 (NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE). It does > work if the master browser is a win2000 machine, which returns 0x82 (POSITIVE > SESSION RESPONSE). > > What is the proper procedure for browsing for hosts in a workgroup if the > master browser for the workgroup is a win98 machine? I can brute-force it > with "nmblookup -r -S <WORKGROUP>" which issues node status and various > things. Is that really the way to do it, and if so, is there a reason that > the smbwrapper code doesn't use that method rather than the > cli_session_request() method? > > Thanks, > > Derrell -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
