I was following an earlier thread "Samba doesn't free network resource with XP clients", and in investigating the SessionSetup_and_X handling I have a couple of questions. (I only looked at 2.2.7a (not 3.0))
1) It appears that in reply_sesssetup_and_X(), the VC is in essence ignored. When I look at an ethereal trace of browsing from a W2k workstation, many SessionSetups are transacted for user anonymous, and *new* uids are being issued. Is not reclaiming users by tracking VCs chewing up pdb entries? Or is the uid simply being advanced without *real* resource allocation for the guest user? 2) Is it possible to have multiple child smbds servicing one W2k workstation? If so, under what conditions? I can only get it to use the same negotiated session key over and over again. Thanks, Peter Hurley