On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:55, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:20:34AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 08:05, Ronan Waide wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > * libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in, > > > include/client.h, libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c: > > > Change the way we sign SMB packets, to a function pointer interface. > > > > > > The intention is to allow for NTLMSSP and kerberos signing of packets, > > > but for now it's just what I call 'simple' signing. (aka SMB > > > signing per the SNIA spec) > > > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > > > > some part of this change is currently stopping connections to an > > > NT4SP6 PDC working from Samba. I'm getting "session request to SERVER > > > failed (Called name not present)" > > > > > > If I find the bug, I'll post further. If not, I'm sure someone else > > > will catch it :) > > > > Yes - I was clobbering the 'signature' field of the packet, but the > > session request is NBT, not SMB so doesn't have this field. > > Right. The "Called Name Not Present" error is at the NBT layer and it > would occur well before you would start signing packets. There is no SMB > exchange happening yet at the point at which that error comes up.
I was 'signing' packets with 8 Nulls by default, rather than leaving them intact. > Do I remember correctly that there was a post from rsharpe regarding the > "*SMBSERVER" name not being tried? Yep - I fixed smbtorture to use cli_full_connection(), which should have fixed that. Andrew Bartlet -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part