A schema similar to the one used for users, so that you can create groups, with groups members, and optionally a field for gid mapping perhaps.
The point is that we should separate firmly the SID<->UGID mapping into a separate thing, and group/users should have only SIDs. IDMAP will think of mapping the whole thing, and on (file) systems that may support SIDs directly IDMAP will probably be completely bypassed and will not exist. Simo. On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 10:30, Volker Lendecke wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Using the group mapping approach will make very hard for us to upgrade > > to the right way in future. > > What kind of schema would you prefer to put groups into LDAP in a > compatible way? > > Volker > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Key-ID D32186CF, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 3700000 > > iD8DBQE+dudDOmSXH9Mhhs8RAibwAJ9ML3KwV0BWGHjbP2PngS5OtKSUOwCfTicD > RGsJtCkOr2oEUI4fd93CWpQ= > =XlK0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano mobile: +39 329 328 7702 tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
