On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 19:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello everyone, When I am programming a samba client in freeDOS,using wattcp, > I found a strange thing, which is not the same as rfc1002 claims. > In rfc 1002,see below:
> So,during I write data or read data to server, it seems that server will > not send me any keep-alive packet because he will reset the timer.But > in fact,during I raw write a very large piece data to server(not > matter windows or linux),it will send me a keep-alive > occasionally,leading my defendless code crash. > I REALLY don't understand why they don't obey the rules,or do I mistake rfc1002? > > Urgently hope for your kindly help,thank you!!!! See www.ubiqx.org/cifs for a description of this horrid protocol... Also, make sure you understand - the standard is what Microsoft does, not what what any RFC says. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
