Thank for attention! And I am a newer of this newsgroup and I don't know how to reply in web,I find no REPLY button in samba-technical/ web site:) ( So I simply reply this email, am I right?)
Now to the topic. I find it is not due to MS, I tried to connect to linux, it also give me a keep-alive. I don't know how to tell it from the other packets since raw read and raw write have some packets sent without header. And keep-alive packet will mix up with my normal response in socket buffer, I can't tell who is who. I feel crazy. And I haven't found what I want in the website you list till now. -----原始邮件----- 发件人: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 发送时间: 2003年3月31日 18:07 收件人: Aladdin Cai(蔡日基_?捷上海） 抄送: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 主题: Re: When the keep-alive packet sent out,rfc1002 says differentthings!! On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 19:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello everyone, When I am programming a samba client in freeDOS,using wattcp, > I found a strange thing, which is not the same as rfc1002 claims. > In rfc 1002,see below: > So,during I write data or read data to server, it seems that server will > not send me any keep-alive packet because he will reset the timer.But > in fact,during I raw write a very large piece data to server(not > matter windows or linux),it will send me a keep-alive > occasionally,leading my defendless code crash. > I REALLY don't understand why they don't obey the rules,or do I mistake rfc1002? > > Urgently hope for your kindly help,thank you!!!! See www.ubiqx.org/cifs for a description of this horrid protocol... Also, make sure you understand - the standard is what Microsoft does, not what what any RFC says. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
