On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 06:41, Jan-Erik S�derholm XA (TN/PAC) wrote:
> That wasn't interesting as such, it was the number of direct I/O's
> to perform the search that was. The issue is that the file is
> filed up with *deleted* RMS records...
I am aware of that. Unfortunately, in my case, the search is simply
optimized away since the search thinks there are no records. I end up
with only 1 DIO consumed:
search samba_root:[var.locks]unexpected.tdb "garbagein"/log/stat
%SEARCH-I-NULLFILE, file SAMBA_ROOT:[VAR.LOCKS]UNEXPECTED.TDB;1 contains no reco
rds
%SEARCH-S-NOMATCH, SAMBA_ROOT:[VAR.LOCKS]UNEXPECTED.TDB;1 - 0 records
Files searched: 1 Buffered I/O count: 6
Records searched: 0 Direct I/O count: 1
Characters searched: 0 Page faults: 23
Records matched: 0 Elapsed CPU time: 0 00:00:00.00
Lines printed: 0 Elapsed time: 0 00:00:00.00
%SEARCH-I-NOMATCHES, no strings matched
Ben
--
Ben Armstrong -. Medianet Development Group,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-. Dymaxion Research Limited
<URL: http://www.dymaxion.ca/> `- Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
