On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, PINTO ELIA wrote: > > AFAIK this is only supported in SAMBA-TNG. The equivalent option in Samba > for > NETLOGON "Secure Channel" (MS KB Article Q183/8/59 , SignSecureChannel, > SealSecureChannel, e > RequireSignOrSeal) are: > > client schannel = yes, no or auto > server schannel = yes, no or auto > > the obvious meaning. I don't know these option will be supported in samba > 3.0. Please let me > know.
No SMB Signing is different (assuming this is what eike was referring to). It signs the SMB packets (not just the RPC payload). cheers, jerry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
