Like I say, it is possible now, but it's not a limitation of samba that Windows Clients use port 139 - it's a limitation of Windows.
At 10:00 AM 4/10/02 -0700, Jon Houg wrote: >Hi Martyn, > >Thank you for the suggestions. I agree, I think it should be fairly easy to >make a change to our code to use another port besides 137. On the other >hand, would this issue qualify as a request for enhancement for a future >release of Samba? If so, how would I submit this? > >Thanks again, > >Jon -------------- Martyn Ranyard I am not a member of the samba team, and anything that I say may not be as accurate as a response from one of the team. I reply to save those more qualified time, which can more usefully be spent developing SAMBA further. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
