On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, William R. Knox wrote: > As I said, we can do this with a print filter, so it is not going to > break anything that cannot be fixed in another way (and with open > source, there is always the code-editing other way as well). There's > feature rich and feature crazy, and no point in keeping around an option > that falls into the second category (the counter argument would of > course be that if the feature isn't causing a noticeable degree of code > bloat, is it really worth getting rid of it - to be fair, though, where > we are using it is really a kludge, anyway).
It has been known to cause problems when used improperly. That's what brought this all up. And I'm not convinced we should be messing with print job contents anyways... > I suppose the only caveat would be to make big notes in the CHANGES file > when it goes away, but you guys are very good about that, so I expect > that would have been done anyway. Thanks. Agreed (about annoucing it). I'll mark is as deprecated for 2.2.4 cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org -- http://www.plainjoe.org "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
