On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 18:23, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:04:43AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > Samba is including Kernel headers. That is a Samaba problem. > > Ok I see. What alternative do you propose for Samba ? Should > we just disable quota support on Linux and tell people to use > an OS with real quota support ? This would not be good for many > of our users. > > > I'm so sick of these apps including kernel headers, we should just > > disallow it in 2.5 completly. > > Sounds good to me. So do you recommend Samba users requiring quota > support migrate to FreeBSD, OS/X, Solaris, IRIX or HPUX (all of > which provide quota support without having to include kernel header > files :-) :-) ? > > Jeremy.
I suspect the ultimate solution is glibc integration, but that seems to be like getting blood out of a stone. Probably the quota user space tools need to be providing a library and header files for use by applications. Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
