I am getting this in the error log: [2002/09/20 14:53:55, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4413) reply_lockingX: Error : oplock break from client for fnum = 7600 and no oplock granted on (wwwwwwww.doc). [2002/09/23 09:32:11, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/23 10:02:35, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/23 16:31:38, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/24 08:39:51, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/25 08:54:01, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/26 08:50:10, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/26 08:52:08, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(813) oplock_break: no break received from client within 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file xxxxxx.doc (dev = 12b, inode = 4832). [2002/09/26 08:52:08, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(859) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file yyyyyyyyyyy.doc [2002/09/26 08:52:08, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4413) reply_lockingX: Error : oplock break from client for fnum = 8253 and no oplock granted on this file (zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.doc).
I have noticed suggestions of making: oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no kernel oplocks = no What exactly does this do? We are running Win2k clients on a SCO OpenServer 5.0.4 running as a file server. The log.nmbd contains the following: [2002/09/26 11:15:14, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(105) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.xxx.3 for name LANGROUP<1d>. This response was from IP 192.168.xxx.2, reportingan IP address of 192.168.xxx.2. [2002/09/26 11:25:33, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(105) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.xxx.3 for name LANGROUP<1d>. This response was from IP 192.168.xxx.2, reportingan IP address of 192.168.xxx.2. [2002/09/26 11:30:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(105) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.xxx.3 for name LANGROUP<1d>. This response was from IP 192.168.xxx.2, reportingan IP address of 192.168.xxx.2. [2002/09/26 11:35:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(105) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.xxx.3 for name LANGROUP<1d>. This response was from IP 192.168.xxx.2, reportingan IP address of 192.168.xxx.2. I'm not sure a) What this means? ... and b) How to correct it if it is a problem? Yours sincerely, John Knox SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR RIDER HUNT MELBOURNE Phone: +61 3 9690 6111 Fax: +61 3 9690 6577 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail communication, please notify us immediately by e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or reply by e-mail direct to the sender and then destroy any electronic or paper copy of this message. Rider Hunt Melbourne does not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of errors, virus or interference. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
