On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote: > Le jeu 26/09/2002 � 14:47, Benjamin Weber a �crit : > > Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET options. > > > > In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I > > found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and SO_RCVBUF=4096 worked way better than with > > 8192 as value. Today I verified this behavior. > > > > so did I! 4069 is much faster here (Win XP pro for the clients, > 2.4.19(gentoo) kernel, samba 2.2.5.
Are either of you using "large readwrite = yes" as well? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
