It is only "visible" if you have a SunSolve account. Unfortunately, the
access won't help you all that much. The solution is to rebuild samba with
spin locks (i.e. with the --with-spinlocks configuration option). From a
letter from Jeremy to the Sun rep that is quoted in the Bug report
---
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:42:36PM +0100, Andy Bowers wrote:
> Hello,
> is it valid to rebuild samba with spin locks instead for solaris ?
Yes this will work, but is not a production solution. The problem
is spinlocks are user level, and if an smbd goes down holding
one we're screwed. There's also no way to prevent an unfortunate
kill -9 at the wrong time.
Jeremy
---
So there is no real "Solaris fix", unfortunately.
Bill Knox
Senior Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
The MITRE Corporation
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:39:34 +0000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Richard Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Walter Mautner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Problem with Samba on Solaris 2.6
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:37:00PM +0100, Richard Davies wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy
> >
> >
> > Sure this the correct bug id for solaris 2.6 as I can't find any
> > reference to it on the sun web site?
>
> According to an earlier mail this is correct. It's the fix for Solaris
> fcntl scaling problems.
>
> Jeremy.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba