Kaleb Pederson wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 October 2002 12:53 pm, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Kaleb Pederson wrote: > <snip> > > > > And tcp 445, the new port that Win2k (and hence Samba 3.0) now uses. > > (Netbiosless SMB/CIFS) > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > Doesn't it drop back to 139 (or one of the other ports) if it can't make a > connection on (what I believe is the encrypted) port?
There is very little that is 'encrypted' in SMB. It uses a challange-response authentication scheme - but it has so many holes in it that you would be very unwise to put it anywhere you don't trust... Samba does not support any SMB signing or SMB sealing at present. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
