On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 12:44, Yannick Mercier wrote: > Hi, > I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the > "restrict anonymous" as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed > to behave from the start, in order to deny > ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man : > "When restrict anonymous is yes, all anonymous connections are denied no > matter what they are for." > > Ive been reading some dev mailing lists and someone said that there would be > 0, 1 , 2 as > possible values to the "restrict anonymous" option, as it been done yet ?
In Samba 3.0 we now have support for this new mode (0, 1 and 2 are now implemented), where 'restrict anonymous' provides a security benefit. The current 2.2 implementation is unfortunately named, and was designed to prevent changes to %U in smb.conf macros. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
