On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:10:19 jra wrote: >On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:06:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> True, but was his desire to prevent deletion of the directory, like in >> DOS? >> >> C:\>mkdir test >> C:\>attrib +r test >> C:\>rmdir test >> Access is denied. >> C:\>attrib -r test >> C:\>rmdir test >> >> This works on windows mapped shares, but not on samba. > >Deletion of a file/directory in UNIX is dependent on the >'w' permissions of the enclosing directory (parent), not >the file/directory itself. > >Jeremy. > Yes, of course, so just push the w-bit aside for a second until a file is created and then put it back again. So, where's the problem? Is it woodoo? No, purest white magic. Like lifting the tombstone from Lazarus's grave.
How else does restore of so many backups work? If it wouldn't restore write-protected directories, it shouldn't back 'em up either? Server side storage of profiles, off-line resources and so many new things of which our ancestors (Kernighan, Ritchie, Leighton) never dreamt are all instances of massive backup objects. There must be a way to handle it reasonably even on a legacy system like *nix. By now, Dragan _____________________________________________________________ Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus&ref=lmtplus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
