> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:18:43AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote: >> I tried sending a log but it was too large for the list. This is another >> excerpt, which is hopefully not too big. It is clipped to include only >> the activity that started at 03:36:30. It is from a different >> workstation to the last one, and is again logging at level 3. >> >> I hope you can spot what I've done wrong! > > There's nothing wrong, it's just that this debug message has > a silly debug level of 0. I'm changing that to 1 now. > > Volker >
Many thanks for looking into this. I confess it took me a minute or two to understand your reply! Now that (I think) I do understand it, can I just ask why you are changing it to debug level 1, rather than higher? I notice that there are other kinds of NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED errors at level 3 - e.g.: [2009/05/04 03:36:30, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet_set(61) error packet at smbd/reply.c(729) cmd=117 (SMBtconX) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I only ask because my understanding is that level 1 still constitutes a 'warning', and yet you say there is nothing wrong with my configuration (and, as I said, it works great :)). The way I have syslog configured, though I will in future be spared these warnings breaking through to the console, I will still have my 'messages' log fill up with these 'warnings'. I am completely unskilled in the inner workings of Samba, so I am certainly *not* saying I know better than you!! But if my configuration really *is* OK, then these warning really are unnecessary - is there I way I can silence them? Thanks again Barnaby -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
