On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:13:07AM +0200, Andreas Ladanyi wrote: > Hi volks, > > i want to ask if the "fs_acl_xattr" and "vfs_acl_tdb" in samba 3.3 are > now "stable" or if its planned to be stable in 3.4
There are a couple of features I'd like to add to these modules before I'd consider them "stable". 1). I need to use transactions in the tdb code for ACLs. (you don't want to lose all your ACL db :-). 2). I need to implement the timestamp feature that will allow the ACL modules to detect other programs modifying the acls out from under smbd. I have some code on my laptop for this, but it might not make 3.4.0. > What is the experience with this vfs modules in 3.3 ? I know some OEM's who have tested this, I haven't had any bug reports to either they're stable, or they decided not to use them :-). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
