|
Someone else might well know better but....
I
believe this is a file system issue. ext2/ext3 manipulate the directory
entries using lists so if you have a great many files in one directory you will
see performance issues as you describe.
The
answer to this is to change filesystem - no mean feat with your data
sizes. Filesystems like XFS and ReiserFS use binary trees to manipulate
the directory entries and it is a far faster way of doing things with crowded
directories so you should see an improvemnet.
I
suppose an alternative short term solution is to get the users to break large
directories up into small ones if the data lends itself to
it.
HTH
Noel
|
- [Samba] Samba Performance question Belgardt, Wolfgang
- Re: [Samba] Samba Performance question Noel Kelly
- Re: [Samba] Samba Performance question Jim Morris
- RE: [Samba] Samba Performance question Dragan Krnic
- Re: [Samba] Samba Performance question Guenther Deschner
- Re: [Samba] Samba Performance question paul . r . schenk
- RE: [Samba] Samba Performance question Belgardt, Wolfgang
- RE: [Samba] Samba Performance question Jim Morris
- RE: [Samba] Samba Performance question Belgardt, Wolfgang
- RE: [Samba] Samba Performance question paul . r . schenk
- Re: [Samba] Samba Performance question Dragan Krnic
