Hi, yes I've seen quite the same that network browsing does not show the server. This is kind of 'uncomfortable' but my users just live with it, as they don't really have another choice.
Could you manage to try if a franky build would fix that? I'm curious but horrible out of time to play with samba right now :-(( Regards, --- Mr. Olli On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:12 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Marcio Merlone<marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br> > wrote: > > Mister Olli escreveu: > >> > >> see http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Franky. > >> > > > > At this point of samba4 devel, is it possible to run a small network without > > the Frank stuff, i.e. a pure samba4 setup without samba3? I just need an AD, > > file sharing and a couple of Windows server members, no printers, no nothing > > fancy. > > I've just tried samba4 in a small virtualized environment (3 vms) > using ubuntu karmic (9.10 alpha) as server and windows 2k and xp as > clients. > > I could add machines and users to the domain, access shares in the > server, but I couldn't browse the network. smbclient doesn't work for > browsing either, it shows a "REWRITE: browsing not implemented" or > something like that. > > HTH, > Norberto -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
