Hallo, John, Du meintest am 19.08.09:
> Last question then... > What about NFS versus SMB? Are both about the same speed? [fullquote deleted] NFS is faster, but (in my opinion, and without Kerberos etc.) less secure. On some machines I had mounted NFS shares from other machines and had made SMB shares out of them. Ugly, but most times it worked. Sometimes it was horribly slow. If you have to serve windows clients, smb is the first (or only) choice. If you have to serve linux clients, you should run cifs, the alternative NFS + NIS (or something like that) is ugly. Maybe Volker's idea to "implement" the NFS/NIS-crap into "winbindd" may lead to a fine solution. Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
