BUMP! :-)
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:34:45PM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:3.4.2 Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support Brigham Young University On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jeremy Allison <j...@samba.org> wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:19:46PM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > Here is a capture of top at the time: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 5842 root 20 0 873m 6912 4612 S 0.0 0.4 0:01.20 winbindd > 5848 root 20 0 872m 3260 2272 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.08 winbindd > 5849 root 20 0 872m 3640 2652 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.06 winbindd > 5850 root 20 0 872m 3320 2200 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.06 winbindd > 5859 root 20 0 874m 2684 1448 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 winbindd > 5954 root 20 0 872m 3740 2284 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.02 winbindd > 5955 root 20 0 872m 3804 2348 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.04 winbindd > 6025 root 20 0 873m 1544 4 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 winbindd > 6026 root 20 0 873m 1548 4 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 winbindd > 6518 root 20 0 873m 5048 3476 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 winbindd > 6576 root 20 0 873m 6228 4232 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.00 winbindd > 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 > 529 root 16 -4 21076 632 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.16 udevd > 6574 root 20 0 18824 1264 940 R 0.0 0.1 0:00.10 top > 1761 root 20 0 5904 320 184 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 syslogd > 1805 root 20 0 48868 720 216 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 sshd > 5768 root 20 0 78572 916 200 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.14 sshd Well 873m is a little excessive, even for virtual memory :-). That's a memory leak I'd guess. What winbindd version is this ?Ok, can you get a message pool usage dump by doing: smbcontrol <pid> pool-usage on one of the monstrous winbindd processes please ? Thanks, Jeremy.
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
