Hello Helmut I don't understand your comment
I think you said You meant message posted on 10/31/09 with subject "[Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections?" If that is accurate, then yes, I ws referring to that post > -----Original Message----- > From: Helmut Hullen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? > > Hallo, Brian, > > Du meintest am 31.10.09 zum Thema Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes > and connections?: > > > Well, my log attachments didn't go through so I posted to bugzilla > > here > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6862 > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Brian [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 12:27 AM > >> To: '[email protected]' > >> Cc: 'Jeremy Allison' > >> Subject: RE: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? > >> > >> Well, it was all a delusion. The problem is not fixed - it has > >> returned. I have attached to this email 3 files with level 10 logs. > >> I'm not sure if the attachments will pass to the samba list or not, > >> but I will try. If not I will resend with the content in the email. > >> > >> the files are: > >> > >> "smbd start to first rep" > >> > >> is the log from the time the smdb process restarts until the > >> appearance of the first loop repetition. > >> > >> "rep 1" > >> > >> is the log of first repetition of things after the server has > >> initialized and the session established with the client. > >> > >> "rep 2" > >> > >> is the basically the same as the rep1 > >> > >> it goes on and on..... > >> > >> > >>> No, your trace doesn't look anything like his problem (I just > >> looked). > >>> Your trace shows a DFS referral request for a truncated network > >>> path, not a repeating findfirst pattern. > >>> > >>> Jeremy. > >> > >> Jeremy, if you take a look at the logs (lvl 10 this time) you will > >> see that the first reference to the truncated service name (roo) > >> occurs in conjunction with dfs...so I postulate that it is the same > >> problem Matt is having. > >> > >> Brian > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Brian [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 12:27 AM > >> To: '[email protected]' > >> Cc: 'Jeremy Allison' > >> Subject: RE: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? > >> > >> Well, it was all a delusion. The problem is not fixed - it has > >> returned. I have attached to this email 3 files with level 10 logs. > >> I'm not sure if the attachments will pass to the samba list or not, > >> but I will try. If not I will resend with the content in the email. > >> > >> the files are: > >> > >> "smbd start to first rep" > >> > >> is the log from the time the smdb process restarts until the > >> appearance of the first loop repetition. > >> > >> "rep 1" > >> > >> is the log of first repetition of things after the server has > >> initialized and the session established with the client. > >> > >> "rep 2" > >> > >> is the basically the same as the rep1 > >> > >> it goes on and on..... > >> > >> > >>> No, your trace doesn't look anything like his problem (I just > >> looked). > >>> Your trace shows a DFS referral request for a truncated network > >>> path, not a repeating findfirst pattern. > >>> > >>> Jeremy. > >> > >> Jeremy, if you take a look at the logs (lvl 10 this time) you will > >> see that the first reference to the truncated service name (roo) > >> occurs in conjunction with dfs...so I postulate that it is the same > >> problem Matt is having. > >> > >> [2009/10/30 19:31:29, 10] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2getdfsreferral(73 > >> 25) call_trans2getdfsreferral > >> [2009/10/30 19:31:29, 10] smbd/msdfs.c:parse_dfs_path(108) > >> parse_dfs_path: temp = |OLDJUNK\roo| after trimming \'s > >> [2009/10/30 > >> 19:31:29, 10] smbd/msdfs.c:parse_dfs_path(133) > >> parse_dfs_path: hostname: OLDJUNK > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:samba- > >>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian > >>> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:17 AM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? > >>> > >>> This also fits with my earlier effort to add a new user on the > >> windoze > >>> and bsd side which didn't have all the links back and forth. That > >>> effort with the new user didn't produce all the spamming. > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: [email protected] On Behalf Of Brian > >>>> > >>>> Well don't hold me to it, but I may have solved it! > >>>> > >>>> Was trying to reproduce it but that failed....grrr Will keep > >>>> trying after all this...for the benefit of all > >>>> > >>>> anywho....here is / was the thing > >>>> > >>>> my homes is set to > >>>> > >>>> [homes] > >>>> comment = Home directory for %u on %h > >>>> browseable = no > >>>> writable = yes > >>>> path = /usr/home/%u/Documents > >>>> valid users = %S > >>>> > >>>> I had /usr/home/root as a symbolic link pointing back to /root > >>>> > >>>> then I had /root/Documents as a symbolic link pointing to > >>>> /usr/samba-shares/file-server3/root/Documents > >>>> > >>>> should be ok? at least I thought so > >>>> > >>>> well so far so good (crosses fingers) I deleted the /usr/home/root > >>>> symbolic link to /root and made a real directory there named root, > >>>> then I created a symbolic link there named Documents to > >>>> /usr/samba-shares/file-server3/Documents > >>>> > >>>> ohh and if ya missed it I moved > >>>> /usr/samba-shares/file-server3/root/Documents > >>>> to /usr/samba-shares/file-server3/Documents > >>>> > >>>> and also somewhere in there I renamed "old root home" to > >>>> "old-root- home" > >>>> > >>>> BAMMM near as I can tell no one is spamming any more > >>>> > >>>> Yawns! time will tell if I fixed it, but would sure like to > >>>> reproduce it! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:33 PM > >>>>> To: Brian > >>>>> Cc: [email protected]; 'Jeremy Allison'; 'Matthew Dickinson' > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:48:10PM -0500, Brian wrote: > >>>>>> Not that a matters, remember I have my non-working work around > >>>>>> in place where I inserted a "roo" share. It may change things > >>>>>> because I am not getting that recurring " couldn't find service > >>>>>> roo" anymore which was looking for a truncated service name. > >>>>>> DFS problems does however sound like a different ball > >> game...IDK > >>>>> > >>>>> If you're not using DFS then try setting "host msdfs = no" and > >>>>> rebooting the clients. I'm guessing this may make a difference. > >>>>> > >>>>> Jeremy. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > >>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > >>> > >>> -- > >>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > >>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > Don't top post - please! > Don't full quote - please! (My full quote is just a bad example) > Thank you! > > > Viele Gruesse! > Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
