>> >I don't think you want "security = share". >> >-- >> >Michael Wood <[email protected]> >> >> But I do want security = share.
>Why? > >Volker I did state my reasons in the first mail: "I want to achieve the following setup: - have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users; => without having to log in. - have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user." I have exactly the same setup on another samba on a centos and it worked perfectly. Michael Wood already quoted the following from the samba manual: " It also says that it is more difficult to set up a share that does not require a password if you use security = user, but says that if you do need that you should look into the "map to guest" parameter." -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
