On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 07:22:06AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:36:44AM +0100, Lars Bensmann wrote: > > > Remeber to restart Samba before testing. > > > > I did. > > > > Can I gather any more relevant data to find out what goes wrong? > > Does the debug level you set on Samba make any difference? > debug level = 0 is definitely faster than debug level = 10.
I just set debug level 10 for specific tests. Afterwards I set it back to debug level 2. I guess that should not make such a big difference. > We need network traces of the app starting against Windows > and then the same against Samba. They are going to be huge > and it's going to be difficult to debug, but it is the only > way. I already captured two traces against Samba. One for the first client which is fast: http://almosthappy.de/duhLd6Tm1GQoC3j0YyiJ637IS/capture.fast (16MB) Then a capture of the second client which takes 30 seconds longer: http://almosthappy.de/duhLd6Tm1GQoC3j0YyiJ637IS/capture.slow (26MB) And here are two new traces. One for the first client against Windows 7 serving the files: http://almosthappy.de/duhLd6Tm1GQoC3j0YyiJ637IS/capture.win7.first_client (11MB) And then for the second client (although it does not have a noticable performance impact): http://almosthappy.de/duhLd6Tm1GQoC3j0YyiJ637IS/capture.win7.second_client (13MB) Unfortunately, I have no clue what I should be looking for in these traces. Lars -- When in danger or in doubt... run in circles, scream, and shout !!!!! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
