On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:38:50AM +0200, Stefan Götz wrote: > > Sorry for that, but Samba just can't afford to be called > > insecure by default. > > Absolutely - and I do very much respect the reasons for > that. So Linda and I are > suggesting a non-default option or option value called something like > "YesIWantToShootMyselfInTheFootAndWontComplainAboutItOnSlashdotSoTurnOnWideLinks" > instead of reverting to an insecure default. In our usage > scenarios, such a shot in the foot is something quite > desirable and useful.
If you asked me, I would support that. insecure wide links and unix extensions = yes or so. Now you have to convince Jeremy to also accept it :-) Volker
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
