Am Mittwoch 24 März 2010 20:06:41 schrieb Volker Lendecke: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:51:50PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > while debugging I observed something 'new' the name resolution works fine > > on the samba server as long as I browse the server 'directly' on the > > windows host (\\printserver) > > > > It is not working when I look into a printerqueue etc on the windows > > host, this goes along whith what I see in my working environment, a > > couple of hostnames get resolved but very few. > > > > So you can find to debug logfiles here, one with working name resolution > > and one without working name resolution: > > > > https://www.desy.de/~chbeyer/public/smbd_log_d10_working.tar > > > > https://www.desy.de/~chbeyer/public/smbd_log_d10.tar > > > > Thansk for the support ! > > Compared the logs, I don't see any difference in the > relevant pieces of them. I'm lost at this point. Someone > with Samba knowledge needs to look at the box itself. > > Sorry, > > Volker >
I assume "hostname lookups = Yes" is set in smb.conf During the last months i was also wondering about smbstatus output regarding hostnames or simple IPs - i had the impression that somewhat randomly some hostnames were not shown anymore, only their IP addresses. I'm often running/testing very different samba versions - and the (different) output of smbstatus didn't hit my interest/attention at all. I'm now doing some further tests on the git master branch. smbstatus e.g. relies on info stored in "sessionid.tdb" and "connections.tdb" ... , and the DNS related entries seem to be not properly collected and/or passed over to the calling function (inside the server). smbstatus just displays what the server previously has collected... Cheers, Günter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
