On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:20:47PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Nope. I really, really wish it did. The relevant clients are Windows > XP, if that has any role. And I've confirmed that the files and > directories generated do follow the NFSv4 ACL policies.
And they don't allow to modify them? That's strange. > As a relatively ignorant user, I wonder if mapping for display might > be considered too awkward. NFSv4 ACL's are storead as > 'usern...@domain', rather than as 'username', and Windows doesn't seem > to have the same concept of ordering of ACL's as NFSv4 has, so it > could be pretty tricky. ACL ordering is one of the nastiest pieces of NFSv4/Windows ACL interop. But you can't do much about that. > > What platform is your Samba server running on? Is this > > Solaris? > > RHEL 5. It's why I've been writing lately about the tI've been > avoiding Solaris as file servers since I wrote one of the first Samba > ports for SunOS 4.1.2, way back in the 1990's. I thought it was Solaris because you've got the zfsacl module activated. I was told today that the Linux NFSv4 client file system passes the ACLs as xattrs to user space. So it should "just" be a matter of writing a VFS module to get what you want. Probably very few days of coding. If just had time... Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
