-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Robert Adkins wrote:
> While that is true, is it also possible that they could have > "fixed" something else that is unrelated, but could potentially cause > minor or major issues with Samba? Well you never know. But I was specifically referring to the notice regarding changes to Windows SMB signing implementation. I have not tested this patch myself. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9+iyKIR7qMdg1EfYRAhBiAJwMVa0AxIb+7CigwKSrEpzMNymaFQCgx00g FyY+7XdMT6YGf2+DnxYUXgE= =hkIN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
