Hi 2010/9/1 Juan Asensio Sánchez <[email protected]>: > El 1 de septiembre de 2010 09:54, Daniel Müller > <[email protected]>escribió: > >> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:42:45 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > I am trying to install Samba 4 on a Ubuntu 10.04 Server machine. I have >> > downloaded the sources, compiled it and installed. Now I have to do the >> > provision step. I want to use an existing LDAP server (389 Directory >> > Server)
I believe Samba4 currently does not work correctly with an external LDAP server. >> > installed in other machine (well, really a lot of machines, yet >> configured >> > for replication). Also, the servers only accept SSL connections. But all >> > the >> Why do not just use the samba 4 internal ldap-server?? And just net rpc >> vampire the users and groups from I doubt "net rpc vampire" will do anything except give you an error message :) I believe the "rpc" vs. "ads" etc. options are considered to have been a mistake, so are not supported by Samba4's net command. Also, there is no support currently for vampiring from Samba3 to Samba4. Someone is working on a migration script, though. Check the samba-technical archives. >> the sanba3/Ldap?? I think with samba 4 the old way samba3/ldap just makes >> no sense at all. What should be the advantage of >> the old way?? >> Greetings Daniel >> > We have more than 60 LDAP servers already workin, with custom schemas, and > lot of users and groups, so I think the migration is not trivial. Also, our > LDAP servers are not used only for Samba, and I think 389 DS is more > appropiate for high load environments. I've Cc'd the samba-technical list, someone there might have useful comments. -- Michael Wood <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
