Hi, I'm working on a free french project for school.
To avoid lot of mount point, we use symlink between teacher's home directory and some student's home directory. We support windows and gnu/linux client, so we need the option "unix extensions". We have a problem with this architecture and this patch : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7104 We know that we can access to all files in the server from the beginning of the project. But, if all files has great rights, there is no problem for us. >From now, we can't support windows and gnu/linux client (change our architecture is not possible, unfortunately). Why can't we use wide link and unix extensions together ? I misunderstood why you have change this behaviors. Why not adding a new option with a big warning in conf file to allow that ? Or why not add a new option with directory name that symlink can't exit in server side following symlink (like a chroot) ? How can we have access to student's home directory without add multiple shares ? Regards, -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
