I would like to know if like the [homes] section mapped to a single user at login time (H: drive) would have any of the problems discussed in previous emails.
Specifically the oplock break issue. Since one and only one user can have this space mapped in our implementation (because of credential conflicts that windows does not allow), how could a user have a detrimental experience with oplocks? Since only that user can open the files whether .xls, .mdb or .doc (don't mean to pick on M$-Office) there should be no issue, right? I ask primarily because I've had oplocks off for some time now, but am always wondering about performance increases - I'll take them where I can get them. My other question is regarding a read-only share. We serve *lots* of software from what we call our M: drive. How will oplocks and/or level2 oplocks help there? I'm not sure I see how they will. I'm at the mercy of the randomness of served software, right? Any info on this will help. Thanks Samba Team - You've done a great job so far - it is greatly appreciated! Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba