On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 22:46 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:17 +0100, Vaclav Klecanda wrote: > > Yes, python provision scripts are easy to use. But it is necessary to > > say: "yes, these scripts are the API and wont change. Here is the > > documentation. Do what you can with that :)". > > We will not be making such promises. Sorry. > > The python provision API is available, but we are not at this time > promising not to change it (but we don't tend to change it often). > > Similarly, it will be difficult, but not impossible, for an 'external' > project to keep up with changes we make. > > That said, if you are interested in developing this, please have a go, > and make a proposal on the samba-technical list.
The other note of caution I would sound is that this area is littered with previous failed attempts. See for example http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/SWAT The output of that SoC project was never merged, and has now fallen by the wayside. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
