On 04/06/2011 07:28 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:21:41AM +0200, Thomas Nau wrote: >> >> We had issues in the past as ZFS and Windows have a different understanding >> about how to sort ACLs. In combination with shared access to Excel documents >> this lead to people out locking themselves. I just thought having an >> independent >> ACL store would solve that problem for me :) > > ZFS shouldn't sort ACLs at all. I don't think any of the kernel > code modifies the ACL order, that would change the meaining.
Right, ZFS does not sort the ACLs but as far as I know Windows and ZFS interpret them differently with respect to ordering. > >> Are you using vfs_zfsacl and did you ever run into the problems I mentioned? > > I'm not personally, but the Nexenta people are and they haven't > reported bugs. Good enough for me :) Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
