Am 10.05.2011 12:35, schrieb Michal Belica: > Hi Juergen, > >>> [share] >>> path = /mnt/share >>> guest ok = yes >>> writeable = no >>> public = no >>> write list = @ntusers >>> read only = no > > Hm, is it OK to combine "writable = no" with "read only = no"? I think they > have the same effect, just reversed and using them like this could be a > source of conflict. > >> [share] >> path = /mnt/share >> guest ok = yes >> public = no >> valid users = @ntusers >> force group = @ntusers >> browseable = yes >> read only = no >> create mask = 0660 >> directory mask = 0770 >> force create mode = 0660 >> force directory mode = 0770 > >> but still i get these permissions: > >> drwxrwx--- 9 99 99 113 May 10 11:59 test > >> somethings wrong here... > > And what permissions would you expect? You said "force directory mode = 0770" > and the "test" directory indeed has these permissions. >
Hi Michael, sorry, i was wrong. i meant the ownage of the dirs. i expected ntusers as group owner. but i solved my problem by putting create mode setting in to my share definitions. now it works as expected. thanks for your help. juergen. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
