On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: > Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: > > > > > > > > Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or > > > should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script > > > you included below? > > > > My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key > where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, > I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs > in .reg parsing
I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. Regards, Wilco Baan Hofman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba