ZFSonLinux is very nearly production ready, and I'm preparing to deploy
it soon on a home server. Just a few minor niceties missing for now,
but all the essential features are in place, and the bugs are only
trickling in and nothing major's come up in a while.
I'd certainly not trust it to a ~100TB multi server multi SAN
environment yet, but soon~ zvol has been there from zfs for a while, so
if you want xfs on ZFS in your environment, that's the closest I'd trust
it in production yet.
On 6/25/2011 17:48, Charles Weber wrote:
I have a ~100 TB multi server multi SAN XFS/Samba deployment and have been
using it since early fedora core days. EXT4 is now where I would consider
using it instead of XFS. But with XFS and LVM I have trivial and very quick
formatting, partition resizing and partition duplicating. It has been great.
I would like some of the ZFS/BTRFS or GFS2 advantages but hey on a UPS, XFS
just works and it is proven.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Grant<[email protected]> wrote:
On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Christian PERRIER<[email protected]> wrote:
Quoting Linda W ([email protected]):
I regret misinforming anyone.
I don't think you did..:-)
You mentioned xfs as a very well supported FS and we later were
reminded that its support was developed by Jeremy. I think this is
compliant with "XFS is very well supported and one can rely on this
code"...
--
Thanks everyone for a most interesting and useful thread.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
