Hi, the problem seems to be solved by creating /usr/var and /var/samba,
that need more tests.
Thanks for replying guys.
于 2011-8-16 11:12, [email protected] 写道:
Actually, the target machine run on a DOM(Disk On Module), and its
capacity is limited, so unnecessary module are all stripped, so I
can't use the yum and rpm and etc.
于 2011-8-16 10:41, Christopher M. Bailey 写道:
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, 8/16/2011 12:06pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Samba] Directly replace smb. [Scanned]
Hi,all,
I have a redhat Linux of 2.6.24 kernel(x86_64), which smb is
3.0, I
want to upgrade it, but the system doesn't have gcc development and no
rpm, that means I can't upgrade the smb on this machine.So I compile the
new samba on other machine and copy necessary files and replace them on
my target machine and checked:
smbd -V
nmbd -V
winbind -V
are all the right version, but I can't start the service: service smb
start and etc. are all failed. what's wrong with my method?
My smb configure as below:
SBINDIR: /usr/sbin
BINDIR: /usr/bin
SWATDIR: /etc/swat
CONFIGFILE: /etc/samba/smb.conf
LOGFILEBASE: /var/samba
LMHOSTSFILE: /etc/samba/lmhosts
LIBDIR: /usr/lib
MODULESDIR: /usr/lib
SHLIBEXT: so
LOCKDIR: /usr/var/locks
STATEDIR: /usr/var/locks
CACHEDIR: /usr/var/locks
PIDDIR: /usr/var/locks
SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /usr/private/smbpasswd
PRIVATE_DIR: /usr/private
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
What was wrong with using yum to install gcc and the other software
you require before compiling the tar ball directly on the system you
want to install on?
Cheers,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba