On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:44:17PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:39:18PM -0700, Philip Ong wrote: > > > No other process is accessing it. So any idea why it would work fine > > > without > > > "strict locking = no" in previous kernels below 2.6.36.3? > > > > When "strict locking = yes" we make fcntl() locking query calls > > to make sure we're safe against existing POSIX locks. > > > > The NFS locking code is probably just broken. > > I think you're talking about "posix locking = yes/no".
Well yeah, but "strict locking" will map onto posix locks underneath if "posix locking = yes", which it is by default. So I still think it's the underlying POSIX locking on NFS that's probably broken and causing this :-). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
