On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 08:16:48AM -0700, Darren Kinley wrote: > I tried this with success using my 3.4.2 build but failure using my 3.6.0 > build (both buillt > on the same server and using the same configure options).
What is your platform? Sparc? Volker > > Using Wireshark I was able to see that the two builds differ in their SMB > negotiation and specifically > in their handling of authentication info. I don't know the protocol stack; > it appears that one offers > the credentials up front while the other leaves the same fields blank > (domains, usernames, IDs) > but offers the same details later in the packet (or exchange) in the form of > options. > > I'm not sure if this different behavior in is due to my error or it is an > intentional refinement to the > software/protocol that my 2008 R2 servers can't handle. > > I was hoping that someone might have some insight to my observations but > there has been no > response so far and I'm about to try other variants; 3.6.1 and 3.6.1 with > Heimdal Kerberos. > > Thanks for your thoughts, > Darren > > -- > View this message in context: > http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/3-x-build-and-net-ads-join-no-longer-work-in-3-6-0-tp3903369p3928347.html > Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
