On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:55:48AM +0100, adrian.berlin wrote: > > > That's a really interesting document. I'd like to work > > on that with you to make Samba behave exactly how you > > expect. > > This is a very good idea :) How can I help you?
Keep reporting bugs and testing my patches for them :-). > > I have a jumbo patch for 3.6.x which should fix the > > issues you're having with READ_ATTRIBUTES/WRITE_ATTRIBUTES. > > Where I can get this patch to test it? It's attached to this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8556 as a 40-patchset attachment. > > There are no limits in the acl_tdb code that would > > cause it to behave as you describe. What you may > > be seeing are limits in mapping the incoming ACL > > down onto the underlying file system. > > > > Do you have debug level 10 logs of this ? > > > Unfortunately not, but I will check it again today with level 10 log and EXT4 > and XFS filesystem. > > > > What is your underlying file system ? > > XFS The limit you're running into is on the ACLs within XFS, not within Samba. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
