On 22 February 2012 00:58, Amitay Isaacs <ami...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Since I provisioned samba4 before the DLZ option was available I have >> stuck with BIND9_FLATFILE for now. > > I have pushed upgradedns script to upgrade DNS provisioning from > BIND9_FLATFILE > backend to BIND9_DLZ backend or SAMBA_INTERNAL. > > If you would like to migrate to AD based DNS, you can give the script a try.
Thanks, Amitay. I don't have time to try it now, but I'll let you know if I run into any issues when I do. By the way, how does this interact with dbcheck and upgradeprovision? e.g. which order should I run them in? My current provision is 4.0.0alpha12-GIT-77b9b97 and Matthieu was looking into some issues I had with upgradeprovision which were related to DNS: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8669 Given the above I suppose it might be safest to try upgradedns before upgradeprovision and perhaps dbcheck before upgradedns? But if I try this it won't be in production yet because the last thing Matthieu said about upgradeprovision was that it should not be used until he's fixed it. -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba